Skip to main content

Why the Naginata (Glaive) is Different to the Yari (Spear)

A long discourse on the halberd is best left for some other time, however there is a tendency to lump all polearms together.  It is important to note that the spear is entirely different from a glaive in terms of its use.

The use of the spear in the fashion of a quarterstaff or glaive is essentially the unorthodox method of the employment of a spear.  The orthodox use of the spear is to thrust down the centre.

It is a common tactic to attack the spear by beating, binding or levering it off the centre.  Therefore chopping with the spear in the fashion of a glaive is not the ideal use of the weapon - this method becomes useful in a symmetrical engagement (with another spear) or when the centre has been lost but should be considered the unorthodox.

The glaive, on the other hand, is not best used as a spear - there are many examples of its use as such but in this case, the spear-like use of the glaive is unorthodox.

As my prefered Japanese example is the Katori style I have included some captures from their method to illustrate how different their use of this weapon is compared to the spear.   It is however directly comparable to European methods of quarterstaff and glaive.

Naginata of the Katori Style

The grip is a normal one taking the weapon in the middle, in a similar fashion to quarterstaff etc.


It is harder for the sword to gain the same leverage advantage in a good bind as against the spear, here the glaive has the advantage of leverage (due to the hand position) albeit with less distance.



A grip change with both in backward guards.


The glaive maintains the central grip and does not thrust the weapon through the hands.




The legs are still targets.  In this central grip the weapon is essentially a one-handed cutting weapon in one hand and a one-handed blocking weapon (held with reverse grip) in the other, and thus has something in common with nito (using a weapon in each hand).  Here the sword tries to use a bind to work in as is seen against the spear.

As with the spear, the glaive needs to maintain sufficient range.

Striking (or parrying) with the butt is much more prevalent than with the spear, a direct result of the chopping rather than thrusting style of attack.


Again the hands/forearms are significant targets, here the top hand has been released to avoid the naginata.   



On the lunge note there is no thrust through the hands.



In this sequence the grip has been changed so the front hand is also holding in the reverse-grip position - this is also seen in European long weapons especially quarterstaff.




Half-swording sequence.







Again, attacking and avoiding these arm cuts is a constant theme.


To summarise, the best use of a spear, especially against a shorter weapon, is to thrust down the centre - don't chop like a glaive.


Popular posts from this blog

Spear (Yari) in Owari Kan Ryu 尾張貫流 (Kudayari & others)

Owari Kan ryū is known for its use of the kuda-yari (tube spear). The e (shaft) is run through a kuda (metal pipe) that’s in the front hand of the practitioner.  Interestingly the school’s students start training by doing shiai (competition) and only after considerable training they learn the school's kata (forms). Most classical schools that practice shiai do so after learning kata. Thrusting using the kuda. Cross-stepping.                           Thrusting attack with kuda. Wide stance.   Shiai. Shiai using a spear with a cross piece. The original demonstration from which these stills were taken is here:

The Structure of the Tenshinshoden Katori Shinto Ryu Syllabus

It should be noted that the current head, Otake Risuke, has commented that not all of the parts of Tenshinsho-den Katori Shinto Ryu survive.  I recall his comments in various documentaries that Archery was once a component, and only some of the spear survives. Through various sources, mostly Otake's book, I have put together this brief outline of their syllabus, however I have little idea of the exact stage each is taught except that I believe the students start with Omote no Tachi.  I will use this as the basis for further posts and may add to it over time. I believe their are important implications when Otake says that one of the main reasons for training all the weapons is to train the swordsman against them. Note in this section in brackets are my own comments and should therefore not be relied upon, those from the written work of Otake are clearly marked. Tenshinsho-den Katori Shinto Ryu -Kenjutsu (Otake lists Tachi, Ryuto and Kodachi under Kenjustsu) --Tachi (Use of the singl

Australia’s Turning Point – Signals Intelligence leading to the Battle of the Coral Sea

Australian/American Signals cooperation was not only important in stopping the Japanese advance to Australian shores but marked the beginning of Australia embedding its forces with the United States rather than simply furnishing troops for the British.  Whilst the British, in my opinion , had a long history of using Commonwealth troops to either protect their colonial interests or to take on deployments with high expected rates of attrition, when Australia faced the real possibility of invasion with the vast majority of its troops and equipment deployed overseas, it was the Americans, whose interests in the Pacific aligned with our own, that were on hand to push the Japanese back from our shores. The Battle of the Coral Sea saw the beginnings of the deployment of Australian sea power under direct American command, a joint approach that would continue to the present time – it was, however, Signals Intelligence that led the way to the embedding of US/Australian forces and played a major